I have a friend who feels a lot like I do about Cultural Marxism and the grave, grave, situation that it feels like we one day woke up and found ourselves in. He said to me:
"If the Expo was a failure, at least it provided one thing for us. Certainty. If there had been any remaining shreds of doubt about the chances of a different kind of resolution, or "good winning out" or etc., that now must be abandoned. Not even the slightest deviation from The Narrative is allowed. And further more they are so emboldened, that the irony of kicking out a group of individuals hosting a booth against censorship is completely lost on them. They do it shamelessly. Dead pan. It may not even be their fault, like a zombie or vampire (not the sparkly angsty teen kind) any remaining humanity or good or soundness of mind is gone and replaced by something that although resembling a human body is a house for evil, and is capable of very real damage.
These are ideas I've been tossing around for a long time now, and I've tried to put them forth under different pseudonyms and in different channels, and they were almost always rejected out of hand, or worse taken as a joke. "Poe's law?" was often the reply. I'll stop beating around the bush and rip off the band aid and then continue my defense of what I believe more solidly with each passing day.
What we face is destructive enough, that it more than justifies violence and domestic terrorism.
No bold, no fontface effects, no color changes. I say it matter of factly. Because I truly believe it's an idea who's time has come. Things are going to get worse, not better. They couldn't hate us any more than they already do. They couldn't intend on the destruction of everything we hold dear any more than they already do. There's no need to fear for what they think of us or what they will say. They already call us terrorists. What are they going to do, call us terrorists? If you're content on just happily soaking in your tub of "being right" and can get any kind of satisfaction from that, then you are a selfish and spineless person. Sometimes nonviolence or turning the other cheek etc., is actually the far more evil action, especially if you are doing it out of a desire to avoid blood on your hands. I mean it in the full sense of the words, this enemy is serious enough to warrant any means necessary, and it passed that point long ago. If you think taking the high road has paid off in this fight one iota, then by all means ignore this. Close the browser, blow it off, and go back to your existence doing what you do, because when an enemy is as severe as this one, the enemy of my enemy is still a dear friend, as long as you don't actively oppose it. But if these words DO resonate with you, or if you have had similar inklings to me for some time, then read on. It's about to get a lot scarier.
I'm not like most people in our circles here. I've spent a year and a half of my life total in jail. That's not a lot, but suffice to say in a game of "Never Have I Ever" with other GGers and the likes, I would probably win with that one. The problem with GamerGate is that unlike the characterization of, well every media outlet, professor, and sjw mindset infested John and Jane Joe, the people of GamerGate aren't dangerous. They're harmless. I intend to change that. I intend to successfully argue that it is not only moral, but heroic, and most importantly necessary to defeat this plague. One thing I would really like to communicate to the community that I think only I understand, is that violent crime is INCREDIBLY easy to get away with if done wisely. Planning is absolutely everything. But good choice of victim, location, context, mode of transportation, proximity to get away location, etc. are all controllable variables. If you use that same useful noodle of yours that has got you through so many levels or has enabled you to pen such witty pieces of writing, you can get away with it night after night. The rate of unsolved murder rate in the United States is over 40% And we aren't even necessarily talking about murder. Even just beating the shit out of someone, especially if they've never experienced ANYTHING like it before in their life (which most SJWs fall into this category), is enough to change someone dramatically and unalterably. We can use BitCoin for anonymous payouts and hopefully a tor based communications venue to be our main hub and forum, because we need a community that supports this and rewards it. With money, yes, that's where BitCoin comes in (such a service for anonymous payouts of violent crime already exists actually, one specifically for putting anonymous bids for hits on people. One of the top bids currently is for Ben Bernanke. Such software can be re-purposed for our goals. Google it.) But I believe the communication venue on torr is paramount, because it's not only where we can congradulate people on their bravery and share the joy of a battered and bloodied SJW, it's where we can learn and plan, and strategize. Once people learn that it is possible to talk about violent crime online, provided it's a secure venue, more will come out of the woodwork.
SJWs are a small bunch who are able to leverage media and technology to accomplish evil albeit impressive social outcomes. I intend to make us a small bunch who leverage violence and that same media and technology to achieve another lofty (but I believe possible) goal: Fear. We are few, but when enough "incidents" happen, at such seemingly random times and places, they will see that the only commonality all the victims had was that such individuals were known to be fervent SJWs. The movie "The Bling Ring" showed how easily technology can be used to facilitate IRL crimes against high profile targets. We absolutely can take out one of these high profile scumbags like Sarkeesian, but the important work is just in "teaching" a lesson to that feminist professor on her way home from work, or that scummy SJW mangina who was mouthing off the other day, etc. When the pattern starts to emerge, a cold breath of fear will be breathed on the back of the neck of every SJW fuckbag whenever they leave the house, thinking... maybe, just maybe. I'll admit, it might not be enough to put an end to this right away, but with God as my witness I can't think of anything more rewarding and righteous than making the next scruffy hornrimmed hipster journalist sit down to his keyboard and realize:
the age of slandering with impunity is over; that there might be a consequence for his actions."
Wow, that friend of mine made some good points. Message me on Twitter and we can at least start the discussion. @SpecialFester
yeah no ones touching that one with a ten foot TOR poll.
ReplyDeleteI think the proposal is itself illegal,, however it may be legal to call for revolution against the state the supreme courts ruled on that DISCLAIMER consult your own legal team first.
.But to call for violence against individuals [no matter how clearly they are proxies for the state velvet totalitarianism ] is illegal and using the word terrorism could land you in a waterboarding institution bet that's not on your "have you ever list"
Im no hacker but Im pretty sure there's no such thing as un crackable computer communication at least the code itself.or its routing like TOR there are trade craft workarounds but not conducive to chatting about terrorism. I'm pretty sure the feds just took out the silk road HMMM
So of course inquiring minds will want to know is "your friend' an informer en trapper?
Be that as it may, it might surprise you to know America is already in a pre revolutionary state, according to polls [Fairleigh Dickinson ] 20% think its necessary soon; that's incredible only a decade ago a question like that ones positive responses would be statistically insignificant. Also today the average man on the street casually accepts that a total collapse is coming soon. The government seems to confirm these people are not crazy by its own counter actions.Of course since the government is obviously not rational that needs a bit of salt.
So with hundreds of trillions in debt, and a quadrillion in credit default swaps over head, zero interest rates that cant be raised even a basis point without breaking the camels back is it even necsasary to kill anyone they wont last a week after the EBT cards go dark their precious minorities will murder them in the cities they share.
Another problem is in the interim would your scheme produce the results you desire? Why do SJW act against their own interests? after all they are high IQ whites that in a sane world would simply rule. Why build a culture that rewards stupidity and non whites. The end game is so obviously going to be genocidal to themselves that only some primal drive could so blind otherwise intelligent people. Those of us in the dark enlightenment think its the human drive for status and i would add this generations loss of the historic perspective.
So if you start killing them might that add to their street cred? martyrs for minorities are a big thing with that crowd.Its worth thinking about a teasing the data.
you are correct the world they are creating has a 100% chance of destroying the entire human civilization and so ethically the use of violence against the USG cathedral is moral according to later day western utilitarian ethics. but there where they became too strong to hope to ever overthrow. it was the 70s. at this point you need a real game changer, financial collapse,unbreakable encryption, a joint chiefs coupe,ebola chan, some tech breakthrough in the right hands.
sure I could pull the USG into the field easily i could use washingtons strategy and just let them wear out their welcome with the people trying to catch my irregulars posting all the atrocities they commit. THEN WHAT we have the same disagreements among the people standing. secession ? ok who gets the oil who gets the ports ? I think the people need to see the collapse of their cherished ideas.
BTW if you still want to follow through its the Knights of Holger Dansk you are looking for but you wont find them .
.
Thought about this a lot.
ReplyDeleteFor the sake of argument, let's accept your premises. Now, ask yourself what is necessary to sustain that? It isn't a secret, there's a ton of well-known and legal literature on the subject. And aside from a consistent source of funding, the most important thing to have is a tightly-knit community who may not participate in violence, but will quietly support (or at least not oppose or betray) those who do. The ability to win non-violent PsyOps type struggles is also a core requirement, because that also needs to apply to violent acts in order to get success. Start before you have these things (community + psyops capability), and you're quickly dead.
If you're with me so far, we need to ask how one might get there from here. Hate generally isn't enough; things would have to get lots, lots worse before you could depend on that. Which leaves us with positive community building as a baseline requirement.
Given this requirement, it seems to me that the primary task is not, in fact, violent. If you create a community, and it is targeted by outsiders as a community, you will not have to "educate" them about your idea if mutual aid and defense is part of that community's DNA. If the enemy's legitimacy has also been removed, the last safety is gone so long as the means are available. If they have worked together in non-violent struggle, they will have psyops capability.
Conversely, if you have no community to build on, you can preach your idea - but even if people believe it, you get at best what Moldbug would call "right wing folk activism." Random, untrained actions that are poorly-considered, often fail, and are immediately nullified by enemy psyops.
Looked at this way, even if your beliefs do not change, you might want to alter your focus to community building, while promoting the virtue of mutual defense in various forms, working to remove all legitimacy from your opponents, and taking non-violent action.
You may even discover that you like it. And fate may even be such that it works. If not, then you have at least tried the path of love, and incidentally built what you need to depart from it. But, you know, Rome, Christians... how did that one end? Perhaps our future is a better one that we expect - or even than we deserve.